Center for Retention Studies Syracuse University Contact Syracuse University Search Syracuse University Home Syracuse University Info
Center for Retention Studies
Center for Retention Studies

Home Division Student Support & Retention

Home Center for Retention Studies

Center for Retention Studies Principles

5 Year Retention Plan

Retention Council

Status Reports

University Timeline of Current History

Staff & Contact Us

Related Links




List of all Retention Council Agendas & Minutes

Agenda & Minutes for February 13, 2002
 
Agenda of the Retention Council
Penthouse, School of Management 10:00am - Noon
I. Announcements Horace Smith
 
  • Introduction of New Members
  • Status of Retention Consultant Search
 
II. Progress of the Academic Plan Relative to Retention Initiatives Dan Holliman  
III. Honors Program Update Judy Hamilton
IV. DocuShare - A Platform for Centralized Storage of Retention Project Updates Bobbi Yonai, Anne Shelly
V. Retention Council Agendas-Scheduling Unit Updates March - June 2002 Horace Smith, Anne Shelly
VI. Other Business Horace Smith
Next Meeting: March 27, 2002   Bartlett Room, Newhouse II

Minutes of the Retention Council

In Attendance: Maureen Breed, Ronald Cavanagh, Andrew Clark, Bea Gonzalez, Rosanna Grassi, Dan Holliman, Sandra Hurd, David Kohr, JoAnn May, Helen Murray, Lena Rose Orlando, David Potter, Hanna Richardson, Barbara Settel, Anne Shelly, Horace Smith, Martha Sutter, Seth Tucker, Anastasia Urtz, Chris Walsh, Michael Wasylenko, Barry Wells, Barbara Yonai

I. Announcements

  • Minutes from the 12/5/01 meeting were approved.

  • Chris Walsh and Susan Donovan were announced as new members of the Council.

  • The Council without dissent approved the minutes from the 10/31/01 meeting.

  • Cavanagh - The Vice Chancellor has agreed to hire a consultant. Under consideration are an Academic and a Student Affairs person. Considering bringing them in Fall 2002. V.C. reiterated the emphasis she was placing on retention issues.

  • Holliman - reporting on Dean's Cabinet presentation and outcomes of their meeting.

    The Dean's cabinet wants a two-prong strategy focusing on:

    1. High performing students
    2. And those traditionally at risk

      -VC appointed 2 sub-committees

      1. Chaired by David Rubin to look at IUTs and the issue of academic "rigor" and the ability of students to take courses across the curriculum. They want to examine entry issues… e.g. not satisfied with their placement…ability to sample courses ("i.e. blending.") How do you allow students in one area to sample courses in another?

      2. Chaired by Cathy Newton to examine issues of academic rigor - honors… writing, etc.

        The cabinet is also interested in mixing academic support into the student affairs experience.

  • Potter - Faculty involvement is important…proposes a "reaction" group comprised of faculty from each s/c to respond to the various proposals as they develop.

  • Richardson - faculty appropriately are focused locally and we need to bring these issues to their attention at an institutional level.

  • Hurd - Retention should be put on the agenda at faculty chairs meetings.

  • Holliman - We need to improve the information given to faculty about advisees. The perception might be communicated that tracking advisees is solely the province of faculty.

  • Richardson - We need a better connection between faculty and the administrative personnel that might intervene with students.

  • Hurd - What do we want faculty to do? Advising is very knowledge intensive (course changes, etc.). Is it relationship building, course advisement? How can we "carve" up the advising system better?

  • Grassi - Advising role changes over years. By Junior/Senior year it has become more mentoring that course advisement. A professional advising system wouldn't be able to support this. Faculty should be included on ACC sub-committee on advising.

II. Report from the Honors Program

  • Judy Hamilton and Barbara Yonai presented retention and graduate data on honors students, a comparison group and the university as a whole.

  • Hamilton - Asked the group to consider a proposal to eliminate first-year honors. Also expressed the concern of the honors faculty about meeting the needs of all admitted honors students.

  • Wasylenko - proposes channeling unchallenged student into higher education level course. You need to have more honors section, necessarily.

  • Cavanagh - proposes admitting more 2nd semester but don't eliminate 1st semester honor admits.

  • Potter - Advocates a qualitative assessment of students perspectives of honors resources (seminars, staff support, etc.)

  • Hamilton - could only admit 25 students this semester out of 357 students that qualified based on GPA. She took students to 3.983.

  • Shelly/ Smith - Wants each unit to sign up for 20-25 minutes presentation on progress on retention related activities over the next 3 meetings by 2/20/02.
 





line

The Center for Retention Studies
111 Waverly Avenue, Suite 220
Syracuse, New York 13244
Phone: 315-443-4442
Fax: 315-443-5177
Email: alshelly@syr.edu

For technical assistance, contact our webmaster
webmaster@CustomWebHelp.com

Site by www.CustomWebHelp.com


© 1995-2004 Syracuse University  All Rights Reserved.